Journal of Energy Management and Technology

Journal of Energy Management and Technology

A Comprehensive Economic and Environmental Analysis to Supply the Electricity Sector of the MED Desalination Unit Using Renewable Energies

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Environmental engineering department, Energy and environment faculty, Tehran University
2 School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Renewable Energy and Environment, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran
4 Water and Wastewater Engineering Group, Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The main goal of the current research is to study the feasibility of using renewable hybrid systems and introducing the optimal configuration from a technical-economic and environmental point of view in supplying electrical energy for desalination plants (South of Iran). HOMER analyzer software is used to simulate the load and introduce renewable systems to provide part of the energy of this complex. The electrical energy required for this complex to produce approximately 300 cubic meters of fresh water per hour is estimated at approximately 5.5 kilowatt-hours per cubic meter. Currently, this energy is supplied only through the power grid, which has a cost equivalent to 0.088 dollars per kilowatt-hour. In the following, the possible scenarios are introduced and compared in two modes, grid-off and grid-connected. The optimal off-grid configuration with an initial cost of $65.8 million will have an electricity cost of 12 cents/kWh, with 37% of the energy needed coming from wind and solar energy. In the state connected to the grid, the optimal configuration provides 44% of the required electrical energy through renewable energy, which reduces the carbon dioxide emissions by 4527 tons per year, and by selling excess electricity to the grid, the cost of energy is decreased to $0.078/kWh, which means that the cost of electricity needed to supply each cubic meter of freshwater falls down about 11.4%. Also, 47% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.
Keywords

Subjects


1. S. A. Kalogirou, “Seawater desalination using renewable energy sources,” Progress in energy and combustion science, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 242–281, 2005.
2. D. Shah, M. Panchal, A. Sanghvi, H. Chavda, and M. Shah, “Holistic review on geosolar hybrid desalination system for sustainable development,” Applied Water Science, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1–16, 2020.
3. C. Chen, Y. Jiang, Z. Ye, Y. Yang, and L. Hou, “Sustainably integrating desalination with solar power to overcome future freshwater scarcity in china,” Global Energy Interconnection, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 98–113, 2019.
4. M. A. V. Rad, R. Ghasempour, P. Rahdan, S. Mousavi, and M. Arastounia, “Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid power system based on the cost-effective hydrogen production method for rural electrification, a case study in iran,” energy, vol. 190, p. 116421, 2020.
5. R. Rajbongshi, D. Borgohain, and S. Mahapatra, “Optimization of pv-biomass-diesel and grid base hybrid energy systems for rural electrification by using homer,” Energy, vol. 126, pp. 461–474, 2017.
6. A. Kasaeian, P. Rahdan, M. A. V. Rad, and W.-M. Yan, “Optimal design and technical analysis of a grid-connected hybrid photovoltaic/diesel/biogas under different economic conditions: A case study,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 198, p. 111810, 2019.
7. A. Kasaeian, F. Rajaee, and W.-M. Yan, “Osmotic desalination by solar energy: A critical review,” Renewable Energy, vol. 134, pp. 1473–1490, 2019.
8. M. Mehrpooya, B. Ghorbani, S. A. Mousavi, and A. Zaitsev, “Proposal and assessment of a new integrated liquefied natural gas generation process with auto–cascade refrigeration (exergy and economic analyses),” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 40, p. 100728, 2020.
9. A. S. Aziz, M. F. N. Tajuddin, M. R. Adzman, A. Azmi, and M. A. Ramli, “Optimization and sensitivity analysis of standalone hybrid energy systems for rural electrification: A case study of iraq,” Renewable energy, vol. 138, pp. 775–792, 2019.
10. K. Aliyon, M. Mehrpooya, and A. Hajinezhad, “Comparison of different co2 liquefaction processes and exergoeconomic evaluation of integrated co2 liquefaction and absorption refrigeration system,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 211, p. 112752, 2020.
11. M. H. Jahangir, S. A. Mousavi, and M. A. V. Rad, “A techno-economic comparison of a photovoltaic/thermal organic rankine cycle with several 1renewable hybrid systems for a residential area in rayen, iran,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 195, pp. 244–261, 2019.
12. M. N. Ashtiani, A. Toopshekan, F. R. Astaraei, H. Yousefi, and A. Maleki, “Techno-economic analysis of a grid-connected pv/battery system using the teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm,” Solar Energy, vol. 203, pp. 69–82, 2020.
13. C. Brandoni and B. Bošnjakovi´c, “Homer analysis of the water and renewable energy nexus for water-stressed urban areas in sub-saharan africa,” Journal of cleaner production, vol. 155, pp. 105–118, 2017.
14. J. A. Duffie, W. A. Beckman, and N. Blair, Solar engineering of thermal processes, photovoltaics and wind. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
15. D. N. Luta and A. K. Raji, “Decision-making between a grid extension and a rural renewable off-grid system with hydrogen generation,” International journal of hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 9535–9548, 2018.
16. S. Singh, M. Singh, and S. C. Kaushik, “Feasibility study of an islanded microgrid in rural area consisting of pv, wind, biomass and battery energy storage system,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 128, pp. 178–190, 2016.
17. Y. Sawle, S. Gupta, and A. K. Bohre, “Review of hybrid renewable energy systems with comparative analysis of off-grid hybrid system,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 81, pp. 2217–2235, 2018
Volume 8, Issue 3
Summer 2024
Pages 239-249

  • Receive Date 02 December 2023
  • Revise Date 21 January 2024
  • Accept Date 29 January 2024