Resiliency enhancement with vulnerability mitigation and redundancy improvement of distribution network against severe hurricane

Document Type : Original Article


1 Resilient Smart Grid Research Lab, E. E Department, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University

3 Electric Transmission & Distribution Research Lab, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran


Vulnerability mitigation and redundancy improvement are of the solutions for creating resilient distribution networks that aim to prevent the uncontrollable outage propagation. In this paper, a comparative study is proposed for optimal feeder routing problem and HV substation placement considering cost and resilience. In the first case, the network is planned based on cost minimization, and then the proposed resilience index is calculated for the planned network. While in the second case, the network is designed based on resilience enhancement, and afterward, the planned network cost is calculated. In the case of resilient-based planning, the studied area is divided into small sites with different wind speed to evaluate the geospatial characteristics of a hurricane. A fragility index is calculated for each distribution network component located at each site. Furthermore, in this paper, the effect of HV substation number as redundancy improvement is considered in cost and resilient based planning performance. Results show that with increasing of the HV substation number, the cost of feeder routing is less increased. While it has more effect on the improvement of the resilient performance index. The obtained results validate the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed method.


Main Subjects

1. Executive Office of the President, Economic Benefits of Increasing Electric Grid Resilience to Weather Outages, Tech. Rep., 2013.
2. P. Hines, J. Apt, and S. Talukdar, “Trends in the history of large blackouts in the United States,” in Proc. 2008 IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meeting-Convers. Del. Electr. Energy 21st Century, Jul. pp. 1–8, 2008.
3. T. H. Haines, “V Hurricane experiences of power utilities in Boston Area,” Electr. Eng. vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 109–110, 1393.
4. E. D. Vugrin, D. E. Warren, and M. A. Ehlen, “A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane,” Process Safety Progress, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 280–290, 2011.
5. N. M. Tabatabaei, S. Najafi Ravadanegh and N. Bizun , Power System Resilience: Modeling, Analysis and Practice, Switzerland, Springer, 2019.
6. J. P. Watson and R. Guttromson, “Conceptual framework for developing resilience metrics for the electricity, oil, and gas sectors in the United States”. 2015.
7. F. D. Petit, R. E. Fisher, and S. N. Veselka, Resilience Measurement Index. Argonne National Laboratory, USA, 2013.
8. S. D. Manshadi and M. E. Khodayar, “Expansion of autonomous microgrids in active distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1878 – 1888, 2018.
9. H. Gao, Y. Chen, Y. Xu, and C. C. Liu, “Resilience-oriented critical load restoration using microgrids in distribution systems,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2837–2848, 2016.
10. R. Arghandeh, A. von Meier, L. Mehrmanesh, and L. Mili, “On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 58, pp. 1060–1069, 2016.
11. A. Kwasinski, “Quantitative model and metrics of electrical grids’ resilience evaluated at a power distribution level,” Energies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 93-101, 2016.
12. Y. Xu, C.-C. Liu, K. P. Schneider, and D. T. Ton, “Toward a resilient distribution system,” in IEEE Power & Energy Society
General Meeting, pp. 1–5, 2015.
13. R. Albert and A.-L. Barab´asi, “Statistical mechanics of complex networks,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 74, no.1, p. 47, 2002.
14. X. F. Wang and G. Chen, “Complex networks: small-world, scalefree and beyond,” Circuits and Systems Magazine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6– 20, 2003.
15. S. Chanda and A. K. Srivastava, “Defining and enabling resilience of electric distribution systems with multiple microgrids,” IEEE Transaction on Smart Grid, no. 99, pp. 1–1, 2016.
16. H. Zhang, Z. Bie, Gengfeng Li and Y. Lin “Assessment method and metrics of power system resilience after disasters” The Journal of Engineering, no. 16, pp. 880-883, 2019.
17. L. Diansheng, X. Yongwei, Z. Yuanyuan, L. Canbing, B. Zhou, H. Yu, and Q. Wu. "Evaluation method of distribution network resilience focusing on critical loads." IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 61633-61639,
18. D. Trakas, and N. D. Hatziargyriou. "Optimal distribution system operation for enhancing resilience against wildfires." IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 2260-2271, 2018.
19. B. Pouresmaeil, S. Najafi Ravadanegh; S. Hosseinzadeh, “Optimal Bi-level Planning of Autonomous MGs,” vol. 3, no. 2, Spring pp. 1-8, 2019.
20. S. Chanda, “Measuring and enabling of resilience using multiple microgrids,” Master’s thesis, Washington State University, 2015.
21. J. Winkler, L. Due ˜nas-Osorio, R. Stein, D. Subramanian, , “Performance assessment of topologically diverse power systems subjected to hurricane events” , Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 323–336, 2010.
22. M. Panteli, C. Pickering, S. Wilkinson, R. Dawson, and P. Mancarella, “ Power System Resilience to Extreme Weather: Fragility Modelling, Probabilistic Impact Assessment, and Adaptation Measures” , IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 5 , pp. 3747 – 3757, 2017.
23. FEMA, Hazards U.S. multi-hazard (HAZUS-MH) assessment tool vs 1.4, Washington, DC, 2008
24. S. Najafi Ravadanegh, R. Gholizadeh Roshanagh, “ On optimal multistage electric power distribution networks expansion planning, Electrical Power and Energy Systems” , vol. 54, pp. 487-497, 2014.
Volume 5, Issue 1
March 2021
Pages 8-16
  • Receive Date: 06 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 28 March 2020
  • Accept Date: 22 April 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 March 2021